The Clinicians That Code briefing
One email a week. Five minutes. What happened at the crossroads of medicine, code and regulation; no vendor marketing, no filler. We aggressively filter the firehose so you do not have to drink from it.
Published every Friday. Get it by email below; the archive lives here. Back to the directory.
Latest issue
Issue 13 · 6 November 2026 · 10 signals · 7 min read
Top signal
A safety net for the referrals nobody chased Wayne Han Lee and colleagues, writing in npj Digital Medicine on 30 October, built MR-AI, which reads primary care consultation notes and flags referral intent that never turned into an order. In a quasi-experimental study across seven clinics in Singapore it scanned about 25,000 notes a week and raised weekly missed referral detection by 4.7 percentage points (p < 0.001), an estimated sevenfold increase. Of 428 cases flagged, 225 were confirmed by a clinician, alongside 31 that patients reported, for 256 detections at 99.9 per cent specificity and 48.8 per cent sensitivity. In a blinded one-week comparison against seven physician reviewers, positive predictive value was 61.8 per cent against a human confirmation rate of 51.8 per cent across 83 flagged cases, with about 41 fewer projected staff-hours. Read the sensitivity first: the net catches roughly half of what is there, so it is a second pair of eyes, not a replacement for the first. The authors say lasting improvement needs preventive workflow changes and a cost-effectiveness study, not just a better model. npj Digital Medicine
Also in this issue: shipped this week (3), build safely (2), tools & guides (1), events (1), new in the directory (1), from us (1).
Archive
Every issue, newest first. Open data, no gating; the archive is the product. Also available as a feed.
- issue-0132026-11-0610 signals7 minA safety net for the referrals nobody chased, published 6 November 2026
- issue-0122026-10-3022 signals10 minHuman oversight is not a safety net you can assume, published 30 October 2026
- issue-0112026-10-1611 signals6 minThe MHRA's plan to 2030: a Centre for AI and Digital Health, published 16 October 2026
- issue-0102026-10-099 signals5 minThe government said yes to all 44, published 9 October 2026
- issue-0092026-10-029 signals5 minAsk an AI tool to find the evidence and it will, usually, miss most of it, published 2 October 2026
- issue-0082026-09-2512 signals5 minWhat a chatbot should do when the patient on the other end is in crisis, published 25 September 2026
- issue-0072026-09-1814 signals6 minFragmented, narrowly technical, and disconnected from the ward, published 18 September 2026
- issue-0062026-09-1119 signals8 minA staged path into use, and a public record of what goes wrong, published 11 September 2026
- issue-0052026-09-0421 signals8 minNot a device, says the regulator; patients are catching the errors, says the watchdog, published 4 September 2026
- issue-0042026-08-2817 signals6 minThe pharmacists' defence body puts the professional in the loop, published 28 August 2026
- issue-0032026-08-2116 signals4 minThe FDA opens the file on generative AI devices, published 21 August 2026
- issue-0022026-08-1428 signals4 minHealth systems are deploying AI faster than they can test it, published 14 August 2026
- issue-0012026-08-0722 signals3 minThe MHRA opens a regulatory sandbox for AI medical devices, published 7 August 2026